Leveraging LSTM Networks for Vehicle Stability Prediction: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional Models under Dynamic Load Conditions

Authors

  • Yinlei Chen Kyungil University, Gyeongsan-si, Republic of Korea Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/rmaw9551

Keywords:

Vehicle Stability, LSTM, Deep Learning, Time-Series Analysis, Load Variability, Machine Learning, Dynamic Driving Conditions, Vehicle Dynamics, Predictive Modeling, Real-time Systems

Abstract

Vehicle stability, particularly under dynamic vertical load conditions, is a critical factor in automotive safety and performance. Traditional methods, primarily based on vehicle dynamics and physical modeling, often fail to address the non-linearities and complexities inherent in real-world driving conditions. This paper explores the application of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, a deep learning model designed for time-series data, to predict vehicle stability under varying loading conditions. LSTM's ability to capture temporal dependencies and non-linear relationships makes it a promising tool for modeling stability in dynamic environments. By comparing the performance of LSTM with traditional vehicle dynamics models, this study highlights the advantages of deep learning in handling the complexities of real-time stability prediction. Using a comprehensive dataset that includes variables such as load, vehicle speed, and road conditions, the results indicate that LSTM models outperform traditional methods in capturing the intricate dynamics of vehicle behavior, particularly under fluctuating loads and changing road conditions. However, challenges related to model interpretability, computational demands, and data quality persist, suggesting that further research is needed to optimize LSTM's application in real-time stability systems. This study contributes to the growing body of research on the application of machine learning in automotive safety, providing insights into how LSTM can be integrated into predictive models for improved vehicle control. Future work could focus on refining model accuracy and expanding its applicability to a broader range of driving conditions and vehicles.

References

[1]Sun, Y., & Ortiz, J. (2024). An ai-based system utilizing iot-enabled ambient sensors and llms for complex activity tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02606.

[2]Ren, L. (2025). Leveraging Large Language Models for Anomaly Event Early Warning in Financial Systems. European Journal of AI, Computing & Informatics, 1(3), 69-76.

[3]Wang, H., Li, Q., & Liu, Y. (2023). Adaptive supervised learning on data streams in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces with data sparsity constraint. Stat, 12(1), e514.

[4]Ren, L. (2025). Causal Modeling for Fraud Detection: Enhancing Financial Security with Interpretable AI. European Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 1(4), 94-104.

[5]Ren, L. (2025). Reinforcement Learning for Prioritizing Anti-Money Laundering Case Reviews Based on Dynamic Risk Assessment. Journal of Economic Theory and Business Management, 2(5), 1-6.

[6]Li, K., Chen, X., Song, T., Zhou, C., Liu, Z., Zhang, Z., Guo, J., & Shan, Q. (2025a, March 24). Solving situation puzzles with large language model and external reformulation.

[7]Luo, M., Zhang, W., Song, T., Li, K., Zhu, H., Du, B., & Wen, H. (2021, January). Rebalancing expanding EV sharing systems with deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1338-1344).

[8]Zhu, H., Luo, Y., Liu, Q., Fan, H., Song, T., Yu, C. W., & Du, B. (2019). Multistep flow prediction on car-sharing systems: A multi-graph convolutional neural network with attention mechanism. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 29(11n12), 1727–1740.

[9]Liu, Z. (2025). Human-AI Co-Creation: A Framework for Collaborative Design in Intelligent Systems. arXiv:2507.17774.

[10]Wang, H., Li, Q., & Liu, Y. (2022). Regularized Buckley–James method for right‐censored outcomes with block‐missing multimodal covariates. Stat, 11(1), e515.

[11]Zhang, Z., Li, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Jiang, H., Tang, X., ... & Jiang, M. (2025). IHEval: Evaluating language models on following the instruction hierarchy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08745.

[12]Wang, P., Wang, H., Li, Q., Shen, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). Joint and individual component regression. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 33(3), 763-773.

[13]Liu, Z. (2022, January 20–22). Stock volatility prediction using LightGBM based algorithm. In 2022 International Conference on Big Data, Information and Computer Network (BDICN) (pp. 283–286). IEEE.

[14]Pang, F. (2020, November). Research on Incentive Mechanism of Teamwork Based on Unfairness Aversion Preference Model. In 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME) (pp. 944-948). IEEE.

[15]Wang J, Tse K T, Li S W. Integrating the effects of climate change using representative concentration pathways into typhoon wind field in Hong Kong[C]//Proceedings of the 8th European African Conference on Wind Engineering. 2022: 20-23.

[16]Wang J, Tim K T, Li S, et al. A systematic comparison of the wind profile codifications in the Western Pacific Region[J]. Wind and Structures, 2023, 37(2): 105-115.

[17]Cao S, Wang J, Tse T K T. Life‐cycle cost analysis and life‐cycle assessment of the second‐generation benchmark building subject to typhoon wind loads in Hong Kong[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2023, 32(11-12): e2014.

[18]Cai K, Wang J. Physics-informed neural networks for solving incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in wind engineering[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(12): 121303.

[19]Liu, Z. (2025). Reinforcement Learning for Prompt Optimization in Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Representations, and Evaluation Challenges. ICCK Transactions on Emerging Topics in Artificial Intelligence, 2(4), 173-181.

[20]Pang, F. (2025). Animal Spirit, Financial Shock and Business Cycle. European Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 1(2), 15-24.

[21]Ren, L. (2025). Boosting algorithm optimization technology for ensemble learning in small sample fraud detection. Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, 8(4), 53-60.

[22]Olah, C., & Carter, S. (2016). Attention and augmented recurrent neural networks. Distill, 1(9), e1.

[23]Quanzhen, D. (2025). Preparation of Biodegradable Eco-Friendly Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive Materials and Their Compatibility with Water-Based Printing Processes. Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, 8(4), 150-155.

[24]Chen, Yinlei. "Daily Asset Pricing Based on Deep Learning: Integrating No-Arbitrage Constraints and Market Dynamics." Journal of Computer Technology and Applied Mathematics 2.6 (2026): 1-10.

[25]Jithesh, V., Sagayaraj, M. J., & Srinivasa, K. G. (2017, February). LSTM recurrent neural networks for high resolution range profile based radar target classification. In 2017 3rd International conference on computational intelligence & communication technology (CICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[26]Zhang, K. (2025). Empirical Research on the Cultivation of Information Management Talents Under the Industry-University-Research Collaboration Model. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 4(5), 88-94.

[27]Agarap, Abien Fred. "Statistical analysis on E-commerce reviews, with sentiment classification using bidirectional recurrent neural network (RNN)." arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.03687 (2018).

[28]Fu, Q. (2025). Implementation Standards and Industry-Specific Adaptation of SAP-Lean Production Integration in Manufacturing: A Multi-Case Validation with Quantitative Performance Optimization. Frontiers in Management Science, 4(5), 67-74.

[29]Ni, D. (2025). Digital Twin-Driven Intelligent Collaborative Automation Model for Global Warehouse Networks and Application Validation. Innovation in Science and Technology, 4(7), 33-38.

[30]Santhanam, S. (2020). Context based text-generation using lstm networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00048.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles